Cases 1 - 10 of 52
BLANEY v. MIKE et al
as 2:2024cv05122
Plaintiff:
MARY BLANEY
Defendant:
MIKE SCREENER, BERGENFIELD VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORPS, INC, ENRIQUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAFNER v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 1:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, OFFICER JOHN DOE 1-10, DIRECTOR RONALD CHARLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv13436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv17101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv13389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12106
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
REED MATTILA v. LOWER MAKEFIELD TWP PA. POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2020cv14699
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER TREVOR REED MATILLA and CHRISTOPHER TREVOR REED MATTILA
Defendant:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL, MHM SERVICES, ALL DEFENDANT UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv15750
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv09783
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
BUNTING et al v. NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER et al
as 1:2019cv00026
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES, NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER, MICHAEL KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff:
BEVERLYN GRISSOM, CHARLES BUNTING and MICHELLE BUNTING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
