Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hill et al v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Tameca Hill
Defendant:
Brian Young, Richard Tolentino, Alexander Verreault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hill v. Racine County et al
as 2:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Rodney Hill
Defendant:
Racine County, Christopher Schmaling and Kamiljit Saini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Village of Howard et al
as 1:2022cv01231
Plaintiff:
Leland Hill
Defendant:
Village of Howard and Village of Howard Village Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Zachary Sherman et al v. Hill
as 2:2021cv00661
Plaintiff:
Estate of Zachary Sherman, Lawrence Sherman and Christine Sherman
Defendant:
Jarvis W Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Debraska et al v. Oneida Business Committee et al
as 1:2020cv01321
Plaintiff:
Michael T Debraska, Nadine A Dallas, Gladys D Dallas and others
Defendant:
Oneida Election Board, Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin and Oneida Business Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
Hill v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2019cv01775
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin
Plaintiff:
Shondell Ramone Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle River Hills LP v. Village of River Hills Wisconsin
as 2:2019cv01638
Plaintiff:
Randle River Hills LP
Defendant:
Village of River Hills Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Dallas v. Hill et al
as 1:2018cv01657
Defendant:
Brandon Stevens, Kirby Metoxen, Daniel Guzman King and others
Plaintiff:
Gladys D Dallas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
