Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Alan v. IRS et al
as 6:2024cv06076
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
IRS, U.S. Atty. David J. Hickton, Assist. U.S. Atty. Paul E. Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Adler et al v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2023cv06513
Plaintiff:
Sabine Adler, Annalisa Barron, Hannah Bauman and others
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, Michael Koerner, Gerald Ludwig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd v. Eisele et al
as 1:2022cv06968
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Ramael Todd
Defendant:
Brett Eisele, Antony Blinken, Alejandra Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lavery v. Rotondi et al
as 1:2022cv02830
Plaintiff:
Alfred K. Lavery
Defendant:
Anthony Rotondi, Keith Longden, Leahy Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cassidy v. New York State Insurance Fund et al
as 8:2021cv00521
Defendant:
New York State Insurance Fund, Darlene Dorsett, Mark Higgins and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Craig Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04981
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Raghunath v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2014cv04218
Defendant:
Lois Abramhik, Administration of Children Services, Angel Guardian Campus and others
Plaintiff:
Princess Jashoda Raghunath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02191
Defendant:
Joseph Bentivegna, City of New York, Naomi Hull and others
Plaintiff:
Tamata Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
