Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00779
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abolish Abortion Oregon et al v. City of Grants Pass et al
as 1:2020cv00484
Plaintiff:
Abolish Abortion Oregon, Shawn Kellim, Ryan Clark and others
Defendant:
Timothy Artoff, Jason McGinnis, City of Grants Pass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
Reid v. Mabus, et al
as 6:2015cv01556
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wayne Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Webb v. City of Grants Pass et al
as 6:2014cv01921
Defendant:
City of Grants Pass, John Does, Austin Earle and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neil Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clow v. Grants Pass Public Safety Office et al
as 1:2012cv00149
Defendant:
Barbara G. Bean, Officer Blich, Grants Pass Public Safety Office and others
Plaintiff:
Wilson L. Clow, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
