Cases 1 - 10 of 11
CARPENTER v. HARTMAN
as 3:2022cv01925
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
JACK M. HARTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GLASCOE et al v. ORTEGA
as 1:2020cv02082
Defendant:
NILDA ORTEGA and NELLY
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARTMAN and ROCHELLE GLASCOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. HILLMAN et al
as 3:2019cv22216
Plaintiff:
RENE' D. EDWARDS
Defendant:
HARTMAN LAW OFFICE, HON NOEL L. HILLMAN, MARK A. GULBRANSON, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTY v. TOWNSHIP OF WESTAMPTON et al
as 1:2017cv01906
Plaintiff:
JASON CARTY
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WESTAMPTON, C ANDRE DANIELS, ABRAHAM LOPEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FINNEMAN v. KENNEDY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2017cv00313
Plaintiff:
NASIR FINNEMAN
Defendant:
KENNEDY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, RUSSELL HARTMAN, P.A. and KRISTY MEGLINO, R.N.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
COLLINGWOOD v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2014cv06228
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL H. COLLINGWOOD
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, KEVIN MOONEY, ROBERT SOBOCINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORO-HARTMAN v. CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE et al
as 1:2014cv03846
Plaintiff:
ALMA TORO-HARTMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE , DUANE COMEAUX and ROCKY MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEIBNER v. BOROUGH OF RED BANK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2012cv04104
Plaintiff:
RONALD LEIBNER
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF RED BANK POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF OF POLICE STEPHEN G. MCCARTHY, SERGANT ROBERT J. GANNON (BADGE 182) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARTMAN v. GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2012cv02085
Plaintiff:
RONALD HARTMAN
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP, GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAVID BELCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
