Cases 1 - 10 of 214
HARVEY v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00494
Defendant:
RICK SWAIM, RICKY DIXON and CLINT BEAM
Plaintiff:
DARREL DEON HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fields v. Hon. Gordon Murray et al
as 1:2024cv24314
Defendant:
Rachetta Harvey-West, Hon. Javier Enriquez, Hon. Gordon Murray, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis C. Fields, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harvey v. County of Brevard, FL et al
as 6:2024cv01339
Defendant:
Jason Steele and County of Brevard, FL
Plaintiff:
Justin Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Wells et al v. U.S. Bank, National Association et al
as 1:2023cv22640
Plaintiff:
Mack Wells and Maurice Symonette
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, National Association, MERS Residential Funding, Valerie Manno Shurr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Wells et al v. U.S. Bank, National Association et al
as 0:2023cv61345
Plaintiff:
Mack Wells and Maurice Symonette
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, National Association, MERS Residential Funding, Valerie Manno Shurr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
HARVEY v. MCNEIL
as 4:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
DARREL HARVEY
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
