Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Holmes et al v. Dennis et al
as 1:2024cv02546
Plaintiff:
Pamela Holmes and Lisette Watkins
Defendant:
Jonathan C. Dennis, Jordan Hopson, Angel F. Criollo-Guiterrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Clayton County et al
as 1:2024cv01461
Plaintiff:
Vakelvion Holmes
Defendant:
Clayton County and Officer Justin Stephens
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Holmes v. Dillard's Department Store et al
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes, Sr.
Defendant:
Dillard's Department Store and Hannah Tedrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burton et al v. Ward et al
as 1:2023cv05836
Plaintiff:
Cedric Burton, Jasman Maxwell and Amber Griffin
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Victor Walker, Raymond Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
South Battery Capital, LLC v. Henry County, Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
South Battery Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Henry County, Georgia, Carlotta Harrell, Johnny Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
