Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Estate of Orlando Urias et al v. Imperial County
as 3:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Estate of Orlando Urias and Kristen Leigh Schmidt
Defendant:
Imperial County and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d Civil Rights (Death)
Victoria Dillihunt et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Defendant:
United States of America, Matthew Abram Groening, Society of Jesus Jesuit Order and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Joe Anaya III et al v. Imperial County et al
as 3:2023cv01670
Plaintiff:
Estate of Joe Anaya III, Samantha Anaya, J.A. and others
Defendant:
Imperial County and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilda Ryan, et al v. County of Imperial, et al
as 23-55042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILDA RYAN, JOSEPH RYAN and JOSEPH M. RYAN
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF IMPERIAL, GILBERT OTERO, mperial County District Attorney, RAYMOND LOERA, Imperial County Sheriff and others
Cordova v. Imperial County Narcotics Task Force et al
as 3:2021cv00445
Defendant:
Raymond Loera, Fontana Police Department, Christopher Macias and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2009cv02292
Plaintiff:
Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami and others
Intervenor:
Our Family Coalition, Lavender Seniors of the East Bay, Parents, Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Mark B. Horton and others
Respondent:
William T. Criswell
Not Yet Classified:
Proposition 8 Official Proponents, Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Californians Against Eliminating Basic Rights
Interested Party:
Media Coalition
Not Classified By Court:
Doug Swardstrom, Honorable Vaughn R. Walker, James L Garlow and others
Amicus Curiae:
City and County of San Francisco, ACLU Foundation of Northern California, Equality California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Apodaca v. Weimer et al
as 3:2021cv01402
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Apodaca
Defendant:
Deputy Bryan Weimer and Imperial County Sherrif's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Republican National Committee et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv01055
Plaintiff:
Republican National Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and California Republican Party
Defendant:
Alex Padilla and Gavin Newsom
Intervenor Defendant:
Democratic Party of California, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Community Coalition and others
Amicus Curiae:
Public Interest Legal Foundation, American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Issa et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2020cv01044
Plaintiff:
Darrell Issa, Jerry Griffin, Michael Sienkiewicz and others
Defendant:
Alex Padilla and Gavin Newsom
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, Public Interest Legal Foundation and others
Intervenor:
California LULAC
Intervenor Defendant:
Democratic Party of California, Community Coalition, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virgie Ayala, et al v. County of Imperial, et al
as 17-55783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIRGIE AYALA, individually and as successor in interest to Decedent Mark Anthony Ayala, SANDRA BARRAZA, individually and as domestic partner and successor in interest to Decedent Mark Anthony Ayala, ANTHONY AYALA, a minor by Sandra Barraza, his guardian, individually and as successor in interest to Decedent Mark Anthony Ayala and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF IMPERIAL, DBA Imperial County Narcotics Task Force, IMPERIAL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and IMPERIAL COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
