Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Evans v. Iceman et al
as 2:2021cv05213
Plaintiff:
Antionette Evans and Antoinette Evans
Defendant:
Jennifer Iceman, Michael Starner, James Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Ilcisko, et al.
as 1:2019cv01493
Defendant:
Daniel Sumpter, Dustin Thacker, Elyria Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cochran et al v. Delaware County et al
as 2:2015cv01799
Plaintiff:
James Cochran and Dawn Cochran
Defendant:
Delaware County, Russell Martin, Kevin Ullom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Hillis et al
as 2:2014cv01348
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Jenkins
Defendant:
Scott Hillis, Susan Small, John Doe Employees One Through Nine of the City of Zanesville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Delaware County Commissioners et al
as 2:2013cv00501
Plaintiff:
Phillip Miller and Cathy Miller
Defendant:
Delaware County Commissioners , Delaware County Sheriff's Dept. , Walter L. Davis III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller et al v. Delaware County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2012cv00790
Plaintiff:
Phillip Miller and Cathy Miller
Defendant:
Delaware County Sheriff's Department , Walter L Davis, III , Kevin Ullom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dr. Richard Gentile v. City of Solon, Ohio, et al
as 1:2012cv01657
Defendant:
City of Solon, Ohio , James Cervik , City of Bedford, Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Gentile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Zilba v. City of Port Clinton, Ohio
as 3:2011cv01845
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey C. Zilba , John Doe One and John Doe Two
Defendant:
City of Port Clinton, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Eggleston et al
as 4:2011cv00822
Plaintiff:
Gerald Johnson
Defendant:
Carlos Eggleston , City of Youngstown and John Does One through Five
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
