Cases 1 - 8 of 8
AUTRY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv01501
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY AUTRY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON COMMISSIONER BLANCHE CARNEY, WARDEN PIERRE LACOMBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patton v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2023cv00598
Plaintiff:
Sandra A. Patton
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Robert Marsh, Jeffrey Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
MENSCH v. PYRAMID HEALTHCARE, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04959
Plaintiff:
LISA MENSCH
Defendant:
PYRAMID HEALTHCARE, INC., DELAWARE COUNTY, THE GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schwenk v. Garcia et al
as 1:2021cv02079
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Schwenk
Defendant:
Joseph Garcia, Corrections Special Application Unit, LLC, York County, Pennsylvania doing business as York County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEDZADOURIAN v. BUCKS COUNTY et al
as 2:2019cv04752
Defendant:
JOHN DOE CORRECTIONS OFFICER, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., JOHN DOE MEDICAL PROVIDERS and others
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE MEDZADOURIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROWDER v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv02618
Defendant:
JOHN DOE PRISON ADMINISTRATORS 1-10, JOHN WETZEL, JOHN DOE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
MARK CROWDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ELLISON v. CRUMP et al
as 2:2013cv03378
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ELLISON
Defendant:
M. CRUMP , JOHN DOE CORRECTIONAL SUPERVISOR, JOHN DOE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS (NOS. 1 -2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHODIYA v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2010cv02711
Plaintiff:
OLUSOLA SHODIYA
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
