Cases 1 - 10 of 29
MCKENZIE v. JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION COMMISSION
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deandre Arnold v. Governor of the State of Georgia, et al
as 24-10835
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
BRIAN KEMP, CHRIS CARR, REGINALD SCANDRETT and others
Doe v. Judicial Qualifications Commission of the State of Florida
as 1:2023cv23167
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Judicial Qualifications Commission of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-12910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-12723
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-12709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Bright v. Thomas et al
as 8:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Leon Bright
Defendant:
Austin Thomas, Checkers Drive-In Restuarant, Wow Burgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raghubir v. United States of America et al
as 6:2021cv01564
Plaintiff:
Vinodh Raghubir
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Florida, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCE v. BISHARA et al
as 1:2020cv00230
Defendant:
MS LAURA BARBER, BETTY ANN JOHNSON, STATE OF GEORGIA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION COMMISSION and others
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE E SPENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
