Cases 1 - 10 of 14
THOMPSON v. HUDAK et al
as 2:2024cv03719
Plaintiff:
CALVIN THOMPSON
Defendant:
JOHN G. HUDAK, JERRY JUDKA and JANE & JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PACIUS v. MOBIS PARTS AMERICA LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
AMAUD PACIUS and ARNAUD PACIUS
Defendant:
MOBIS PARTS AMERICA LLC, ABC CORP(S). 1-10 and JANE & JOHN DOE (S) 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
IMPERATO v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2023cv23286
Plaintiff:
GINA IMPERATO
Defendant:
COUNTY CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE, TIMOTHY K. CHATTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv13564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BELL-PARNELL v. MOUNT LAUREL POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv20000
Defendant:
SERGEANT RUTKOWSKI, LIEUTENANT JANE/JOHN DOE #1, DETECTIVE AMARO and others
Plaintiff:
CORTNEY BELL-PARNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTATE OF WILKINS CASADO et al v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2020cv02108
Defendant:
JANE & JOHN DOE NURSES 1-10, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10, MIDDLESEX COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
JUNIOR HOLGUIN and ESTATE OF WILKINS CASADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BADGER v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv02292
Plaintiff:
GARY JOHN CHRISTOPHER BADGER
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, ELIZABETH CONNOLLY, LYNN KOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROMEK v. MAENZA et al
as 2:2014cv04455
Plaintiff:
VITOLD GROMEK
Defendant:
PHILLIP J. MAENZA, ANN R. BARTLETT, MARILYN R. HERR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
