Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Kansas, State of, ex rel. Department of Agriculture v. Unleashed Pet Rescue and Adoption, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02152
Plaintiff:
State of Kansas
Cross Plaintiff:
Unleashed Pet Rescue and Adoption, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Kansas Department of Agriculture, Division of Animal Health, Justin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Blaine v. Mystere Living & Healthcare, Inc.
as 2:2022cv02465
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Blaine
Defendant:
Mystere Living & Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Clervrain v. Biden et al
as 6:2022cv01086
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Lynn Rogers, Jennifer Goetz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gilmore v. Beveridge et al
as 2:2022cv02032
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Gilmore
Defendant:
Joe Beveridge, Brent Kiger and Jim McMullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
