Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Resendiz v. Christian et al
as 1:2024cv02452
Plaintiff:
Diana Resendiz
Defendant:
Officer Demetrius Christian, Clayton County, Georgia and John Doe(s) 1-3
Calhoun v. Lamb et al
as 1:2024cv01670
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Ansley Calhoun
Defendant:
Almatin Lamb, Jamal Mustafa, Gregory Tillman and others
Rossetti v. City of South Fulton, Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv04474
Plaintiff:
Justin Daniel Rossetti
Defendant:
City of South Fulton, Georgia, Officer R. McCain, Officer A. Jackson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lee v. Office of Aging/Adult Protective Services et al
as 1:2023cv04090
Plaintiff:
Mary Fore Lee
Defendant:
Office of Aging/Adult Protective Services, Attorney General Chris Carr, Bill Westenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Partee v. Hill et al
as 1:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Lashaundra Partee
Defendant:
Victor Hill and John Doe(s) (1-4)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. City of South Fulton et al
as 1:2022cv03741
Plaintiff:
Craig Holmes
Defendant:
City of South Fulton, South Fulton Police Department, Keith Meadows and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2022cv02694
Plaintiff:
Andre Gibson
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Keisha Lance Bottoms, Atlanta Police Department and others
Farr v. CTG Hospitality Group, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00883
Plaintiff:
Thomas Allen Farr
Defendant:
CTG Hospitality Group, LLC doing business as Live! At The Battery, The Cordish Company, Liberty Media Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells v. City of Union City, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv05035
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wells
Defendant:
City of Union City, Georgia, Vince R. Williams, Elliot Garnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
