Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Maier et al v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Maier and Janne Maier
Defendant:
Buck Jones, Jerrod Towne, Thomas Berberich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Rubaroc USA et al
as 3:2021cv00213
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Jones
Defendant:
Rubaroc USA, Rubaroc Inc, Vulcan Surfacing Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Williams v. Municipality of Anchorage et al
as 3:2020cv00304
Defendant:
Crystal Kennedy, Dean Gates, Kate Vogel and others
Plaintiff:
Nial Sherwood Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Department of Revenue et al
as 3:2016cv00156
Plaintiff:
Din Ogan Shango Smith
Defendant:
Department of Revenue, Child Support Service Division, Luisa F. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 4:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Department of Court Records, Allegheny Country, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Deans v. Jones et al
as 3:2011cv00230
Plaintiff:
Lewis Deans
Defendant:
Steven L. Jones , Lythgoe Properties , Alaska Properties & Investments and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 3:2010cv00054
Plaintiff:
Darin Jones
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nason v. Miller et al
as 3:2009cv00161
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Nason
Defendant:
Debbie Miller, S. Carter and B. B. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shorthill et al v. Conley et al
as 3:2007cv00193
Plaintiff:
Carry Eugene Shorthill and Tina Rae
Defendant:
James M. Conley, Christopher Roger Nelson, Richard Dykstra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
