Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ford v. Wood et al
as 1:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ford
Defendant:
Mark Wood, Mike Slocum, Doug Hollingsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Henagan v. City of Lafayette et al
as 6:2021cv03946
Plaintiff:
George K Henagan
Defendant:
City of Lafayette, Josh Guillory, Gregory J Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barras et al v. Garber et al
as 6:2019cv01411
Plaintiff:
Maegan Marie Barras and Josh Barras
Defendant:
Mark Garber and Paula Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stratis Construction, Inc. v. Hammond City, et al
as 2:2019cv12901
Defendant:
PETE PANEPINTO, city of hammond, JOSH TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
carl perkins, stratis construction and Stratis Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12446
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Thomas v. Soileau et al
as 6:2019cv00682
Defendant:
Josh Lafleur, Scott Franklin, Sergeant Rienzi and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langley v. Wiseman et al
as 2:2018cv01105
Plaintiff:
Kayla Danielle Langley
Defendant:
Joshua Manuel, Brian Hargrove, Douglas Hebert, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lutz v. Doe 1 et al
as 2:2018cv08012
Defendant:
Unidentified Parties, Josh James Earl, Grace E Chardonnet and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Lutz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Smith et al v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2017cv00436
Defendant:
AIX Group, Jonathan Abadie, Jason Acree and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Benjamin, Lubin Gilbert, Sophie Kosofsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
