Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ericksen et al v. Newey et al
as 1:2021cv00153
Plaintiff:
Alena Ericksen and Mikel Brown
Defendant:
Reid Newey, John Robison, Marie Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crane v. Cornish et al
as 1:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Daphne Crane
Defendant:
Rita Cornish, Troy Rawlins, Julie Geroge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00008
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00073
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cline et al v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2019cv00602
Defendant:
Julie McPhie, Department of Human Services Division of Child and Family Services, Sean Reyes and others
Plaintiff:
Earl L. Cline, II and Janet Cline
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Presley v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2019cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jason Aron Presley and Ernest John Young
Defendant:
Western States, General Motors, Dick Dibble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Canberra Subdivision v. Harper et al
as 2:2018cv00916
Defendant:
George E Harper Jr Trust Dated the 18th day of July 2017, The, George E. Harper and Maple Mountain Recovery
Plaintiff:
Canberra Subdivision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bierly et al v. Reyes et al
as 2:2015cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jordan Bierly, Tim Bierly, Peter Bierly and others
Defendant:
Sean Reyes, Mark Shurtleff, Julie Lund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
