Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv04981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Jackson v. County of Madera, et al.
as 1:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Cornel Jackson
Defendant:
County of Madera, Brett Frazier, David Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marlon Abraham Rosasen v. Kingdom of Norway
as 2:2021cv06811
Plaintiff:
Marlon Abraham Rosasen, DTR and LAR
Defendant:
Kingdom of Norway, County Governor of Oslo, Valgerd Svarstad Haugland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Etta M. Collier v. Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2021cv02835
Plaintiff:
Etta M Collier
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association Board of Retirement, Los Angeles County, Mary Linn Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soria v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2018cv06168
Defendant:
County of Alameda, Erik McDermott, Sarah Krause and others
Plaintiff:
Fernando Miguel Soria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linn v. Madera County et al
as 1:2018at00613
Defendant:
Eric Fleming, David Rogers, Robert Poythress and others
Plaintiff:
David A. Linn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Linn v. Madera County et al
as 1:2018cv01128
Defendant:
Eric Fleming, Bret Fraisier, David Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
David A. Linn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mack Lucas III v. State of California et al
as 1:2018cv00514
Plaintiff:
Mack Lucas, III
Defendant:
State of California, Madera County Superior Court, Mitchell C. Rigby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
