Cases 1 - 10 of 14
KELLY v. CALLAHAN et al
as 3:2023cv04022
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KELLY
Defendant:
COLONEL PATRICK J. CALLAHAN, MAJOR ERIC DE LOS SANTOS, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
DE LOS SANTOS v. CHIEN et al
as 1:2023cv00657
Plaintiff:
REYITA DE LOS SANTOS
Defendant:
TOM CHIEN and ATLANTIC CITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06004
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOCCHICCHIO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv09266
Plaintiff:
VINCENT BOCCHICCHIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL LAWYER, LOS ANGELES CA VA HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KIRKLAND BEY v. PENNSAUKEN MUNICIPAL COURT et al
as 1:2017cv09019
Plaintiff:
ATIYA KIRKLAND BEY
Defendant:
PENNSAUKEN MUNICIPAL COURT, STEVEN M. PETRILLO, DONNA M. KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZISA v. HAVILAND et al
as 2:2017cv05551
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KEN ZISA
Defendant:
JOHN HAVILAND , TIMOTHY CONDON , ZAIDA MOLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv04714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ROY v. USA GOV'T et al
as 3:2013cv04982
Plaintiff:
KAMEL KK ROY
Defendant:
USA GOV'T, NEW YORK TIMES, BHELTACHVYYA PIYALI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONAGHAN et al v. CITY OF HACKENSACK et al
as 2:2013cv04544
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. MONAGHAN , FRANK CALLAHAN , DANNY CALLAHAN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF HACKENSACK , MAYOR & COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HACKENSACK , PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF HACKENSACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
