Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pickering-George v. Carter et al
as 1:2022cv10567
Plaintiff:
John Pickering-George
Defendant:
Joslyn Carter, Chain Administration Command and Shemella Lovell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lovell v. L.I. Property Services Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv01330
Plaintiff:
Martin Lovell
Defendant:
L.I. Property Services Corporation, Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America, Bank Of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Secard v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2018cv04384
Plaintiff:
Glen Secard
Defendant:
Hogan Lovell US LLP, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Shapiro, Dicaro & Barak, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lovell v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv01867
Defendant:
C.O. Munoz, Parker, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Tameika Lovell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Secard v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv04872
Defendant:
Amanda Gentile, Hogan Lovells Us LLP, Leah N. Jacob and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Secard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belton v. The City of New York
as 1:2015cv00590
Plaintiff:
Lovell Belton
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Secard v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2015cv00499
Defendant:
Hogan Lovells Us LLP and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Glen Secard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07592
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
