Cases 1 - 10 of 12
THOMPSON v. NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 3:2023cv20468
Plaintiff:
RANDY C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, MONMOUT COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE (MCPO) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOLTER v. LOVETT et al
as 2:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW WOLTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. LOVETT and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv09105
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
WOLTER v. LOVETT et al
as 2:2020cv20341
Defendant:
TRACEY ANNE AGNEW, MICHAEL R LOVETT and JAMES MICHAEL DONNELLY
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A WOLTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FINNEMEN v. RABNER et al
as 1:2018cv00656
Plaintiff:
NASIR FINNEMEN
Defendant:
STUART RABNER, ELENA EDWARDS, KIMBERLEY M. WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv08055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LOVETT v. BOROUGH OF CLEMENTON et al
as 1:2013cv04539
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN LOVETT
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF CLEMENTON, RANDALL FREILING and ROBERT WORRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PONI LAL et al v. THE DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES OF OCEAN COUNTY et al
as 3:2013cv00936
Plaintiff:
KANYA PONI LAL, BRIAN KEITH LOVETT, ROZLAND JACQUELINE BROWN and others
Defendant:
THE DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES OF OCEAN COUNTY, DAVID RUDZINSKI, DONNA DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
