Cases 1 - 10 of 13
TERAMORE DEVELOPMENT LLC et al v. LOWNDES COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 7:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
TERAMORE DEVELOPMENT LLC and Mary Harris
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY GEORGIA, LOWNDES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Bill Slaughter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
LAVORIEL v NORMAN, et al
as 7:2021cv00007
Plaintiff:
Ms. Maria de Lourdes Deus Lavoriel and MARIA DE LOURDES DEUSTUA LAVORIEL
Defendant:
Brandon Goldman, Jace Norman and LOWNDES COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. PICCIOTTI et al
as 7:2020cv00058
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY GEORGIA, CHRIS YARBROUGH, ASHLEY PAULK and others
Plaintiff:
SHONTERRA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON, ET AL V. BELL, ET AL
as 7:2020cv00004
Defendant:
BRIAN BELL, RODNEY BRYAN, BRANDON BELL and others
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK LAMAR JOHNSON, KENNETH JOHNSON and JACQUELYN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PHILLIPS v. JOHN DOE et al
as 7:2019cv00204
Defendant:
Sheriff ASHLEY PAULK, JOHN DOE and LOWNDES COUNTY GEORGIA
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ARTEZ PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS et al v. LEE et al
as 7:2019cv00174
Defendant:
Sgt MIKE LEE, Sheriff ASHLEY PAULK, TIMOTHY GLASSNER and others
Plaintiff:
GREG JENKINS, SR and GREG JENKINS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-14867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MOULTRIE v. BRUCE et al
as 7:2013cv00162
Plaintiff:
CORY MOULTRIE
Defendant:
MARTY A BRUCE and LOWNDES COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
