Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02611
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
COPELAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv02211
Defendant:
DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL doing business as DAVID A. HUBERT, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL doing business as MERRICK GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD RUSSELL COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TACCINO et al v. WREN et al
as 1:2024cv01571
Defendant:
MISTY MICHAELS, CRAIG ROBERTSON, TODD HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL J. TACCINO and WILLIAM A. TACCINO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01529
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
SEDITA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
GIUSEPPE SEDITA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK GARLAND and CHRISTOPHER WRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
