Cases 1 - 10 of 43
SEDITA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
GIUSEPPE SEDITA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK GARLAND and CHRISTOPHER WRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CLEMENT v. GARLAND
as 1:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA CLEMENT and HH EMPRESS QUEEN CHRISTINA LOCS IS OUR ARTIFACT OF FAITH
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MITCHELL v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv02412
Plaintiff:
GABRIELLE MITCHELL
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
NAZARI v. MILGRAM et al
as 1:2023cv02226
Plaintiff:
RAS LAZARUS NAZARI and BRUCE TOWNSEND
Defendant:
ANNE MILGRAM, GEORGE S. PAPADOPOULOS and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
