Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Fierro et al v. Rippe et al
as 2:2024cv03916
Plaintiff:
Danielle Fierro and MF by and through her guardian ad litem Danielle Fierro
Defendant:
Mike Rippe, Det. Acosta, Det Castaneda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Robert Sanchez v. Auto Emporium et al
as 8:2024cv00987
Petitioner:
ROBERT SANCHEZ, AUTO EMPORIUM, a business entity, JOE LEZMA, an individual and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Robert Sanchez v. Auto Emporium et al
as 8:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SANCHEZ
Defendant:
AUTO EMPORIUM, a business entity, JOE LEZMA and MF REAL ESTATE LLC, a California limited liability company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Fenton v. BRE Alameda I MF Property Owner, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv04967
Plaintiff:
Jerin Fenton
Defendant:
BRE Alameda I MF Property Owner, LLC and Greystar California, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African Asian Abilities Club et al v. BPP Alphabet MF Beverly Arnaz LLC et al
as 2:2020cv09181
Defendant:
BPP ALPHABET MF BEVERLY ARNAZ LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members and Anna Marie Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gash v. Bre Paragon MF Alvista Baltimore CA LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02252
Plaintiff:
Roy Davis Gash
Defendant:
Bre Paragon MF Alvista Baltimore CA LLC, Jennifer Reed and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Xie v. MF Fund II, LP et al
as 4:2013cv00401
Plaintiff:
Shao Q Xie
Defendant:
MF Fund II, LP, Maven Investments, Craig Lipton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
