Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Mills v. Dye et al
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mills
Defendant:
Darrell DJ Dye, Perry County, Mississippi, Mitch Nobles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. Dye et al
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mills
Defendant:
Darrell DJ Dye, John Doe Officers 1-10 and John Doe Entities 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. City of Winona et al
as 3:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Murray Mills
Defendant:
City of Winona, Officer James Burnett, Officer Orlando Bolden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mills v. Adams County Mississippi et al
as 5:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mills
Defendant:
Adams County Mississippi, Danny Bertrand and Adams County Chancery Clerk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reardon v. City of Oxford, MS et al
as 3:2021cv00118
Defendant:
Deputy Courtney Dixon, Lynn Fitch, Lafayette Co Prosecutor Bela J Chain and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Oliver Reardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Adams County, Mississippi et al
as 5:2020cv00084
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mills
Defendant:
Cynthia Ware Mills, Deselle Davis and Adams County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv00543
Defendant:
Unknown Green, John Does 1-5, South Mississippi Correctional Institution and others
Plaintiff:
Tony M. Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stallings v. Wayne County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Chris Stallings and Stallings Construction, LLC
Defendant:
Wayne County, Mississippi , Wayne County Board of Supervisors , David Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
