Cases 1 - 10 of 34
SHIH v. MASELLI, MILLS & FORNAL, PC
as 2:2024cv06300
Plaintiff:
PIM SHIH
Defendant:
MASELLI, MILLS & FORNAL, PC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SEXTON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2022cv06901
Plaintiff:
CARMEN A. SEXTON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Sean Abrams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2022cv06801
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Major Sean Abrams, DAVIN BORG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
SEXTON v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv20404
Defendant:
JEFFREY PERLMAN, NEW JERSEY DEPARMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL, NJ DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT ET AL and others
Plaintiff:
CARMEN A. SEXTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv17949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
