Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Maddox v. Ann Jordan
as 1:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Asunji R. Maddox
Defendant:
Carol Ann Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maddox v. Francemone
as 5:2019cv00678
Plaintiff:
Tanajee Maddox
Defendant:
Syracuse Police Officer Kelsey Francemone and Kelsey Francemone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maddox v. The County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2018cv05302
Defendant:
Drew W. Schirmer, Dennis M. Brown, The Incorporated Village of Westhampton Beach and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maddox v. Ward
as 1:2015cv06268
Plaintiff:
Kahiem Maddox
Interested Party:
Office of the Corporation Counsel
Defendant:
Police Officer Allan Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Maddox v. City of Syracuse
as 5:2014cv01068
Defendant:
Onondaga County, Onondaga County Sheriff's Department, Syracuse Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Maddox
Not Classified By Court:
Gustave J. DiBianco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maddox v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv02208
Defendant:
City of New York, Sergeant John Doe and Police Officers John and Jane Does 1-20
Plaintiff:
Phillip Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maddox v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv04618
Defendant:
Police Officer Alexis Ayala, Police Officers John Does 1-2, Sergeant John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 FLSA: Minimum Wage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
