Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv07229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ALBARI et al v. EAST ORANGE BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 2:2011cv02362
Plaintiff:
NAIMA ALBARI , RASHAD MELVIN and DONNA K. MELVIN
Defendant:
EAST ORANGE BOARD OF EDUCATION , HENRY HAMILTON , LESLIE SCHULTZ and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
JANET FRANKLIN , EAST ORANGE BOARD OF EDUCATION , LESLIE SCHULTZ and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Tashona Deslandes
Cross_claimant:
JANET FRANKLIN , EAST ORANGE BOARD OF EDUCATION , LESLIE SCHULTZ and others
Cross_defendant:
JOHN DOES I-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSENBLATT v. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX NJ et al
as 3:2009cv04054
Plaintiff:
JARED ROSENBLATT
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX NJ, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTION CENTER ("MCACC") and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ATKINSON v. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2009cv03850
Plaintiff:
JORDAN ATKINSON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, MIDDLESEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTION CENTER ("MCACC") and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ATKINSON v. WOODBRIDGE TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2009cv03797
Plaintiff:
JORDAN ATKINSON
Defendant:
WOODBRIDGE TOWNSHIP, WOODBRIDGE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, WOODBRIDGE TOWNSHIP POLICE DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JONES v. THE EWING SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 3:2009cv03536
Plaintiff:
MARY JONES
Defendant:
THE EWING SCHOOL DISTRICT, THE EWING SCHOOL DISTRICT, THE EWING SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
JONES v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2008cv05772
Plaintiff:
MARY JONES
Defendant:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN, MARIA MARQUEZ and LAURIE LYNARD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
