Cases 1 - 10 of 239
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bronson v. Martin
as 1:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bronson
Defendant:
Mark Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Duke's K9 Dash N' Splash, LLC et al. v. Zizka et al.
as 5:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Duke's K9 Dash N' Splash, LLC and Michelle Filler
Defendant:
John Zizka, Roy Martin, Laura Chartier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Martin v. Cleveland City Council, et al.
as 1:2023cv02312
Plaintiff:
Chris Martin
Defendant:
Cleveland City Council and Blaine Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris et al v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2023cv01290
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris, Jacob Blake, Bianca Austin and others
Defendant:
City of Akron, Police Chief Stephen L. Mylett, Mayor Daniel Horrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Divito v. City of Bedford Heights et al
as 1:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
Martine Divito
Defendant:
City of Bedford Heights and Fletcher D Berger, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lucas v. The City of Reynoldsburg et al
as 2:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
rebecca lucas
Defendant:
THE CITY OF REYNOLDSBURG, Officer Nicholas RUBENSTAH and officer Ryan Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
