Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Clark v. McQueen et al
as 1:2022cv05647
Plaintiff:
Christopher Clark
Defendant:
John McQueen, John Simmons, John Does 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McQueen et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv04879
Defendant:
Dermot Shea, City of New York, Peter Ruotolo and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne McQueen and Ray Cedeno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02463
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
McQueen v. The State of New York
as 2:2016cv04306
Plaintiff:
Nicole McQueen
Defendant:
The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNeil v. The City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv00798
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Doctors A, B and C, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony McNeil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
El-Bey v. Anna M. Kross Correction Facility et al et al
as 1:2013cv02956
Defendant:
Anna M. Kross Correction Facility et al, Badge # 15750, Badge # 860 Fulton and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Aristilde El-Bey
RPA:
Janet Runcie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Annarella et al
as 1:2013cv00257
Plaintiff:
Ramel Sanders
Defendant:
George Annarella, David McQueen, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bivens v. Schrior et al
as 1:2012cv02915
Plaintiff:
Yvette Bivens
Defendant:
Jacquelin McQueen, New York City Department of Correction, New York City Department of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McQueen v. Higgins et al
as 7:2011cv01966
Plaintiff:
Estavia McQueen
Defendant:
Daniel Higgins , "John Does 1-5 and The City of Yonkers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
