Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Luna v. Melendez et al
as 3:2013cv01364
Defendant:
Ariel Melendez , Kristin Fitzgerald , Curtis Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Luna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jefferson v. Reddish et al
as 3:2012cv01543
Plaintiff:
Jordan Jefferson
Defendant:
Thaddeus Reddish , Matthew Abbate , David Guliuzza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farrah et al v. New Haven et al
as 3:2012cv01519
Plaintiff:
Rommerro Farrah , Elm City Entertainment LLC and Long Wharf Realty Corporation
Defendant:
City of New Haven , Frank Limon , Ariel Melendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barolli et al v. Portela et al
as 3:2012cv00029
Plaintiff:
Ersiljo Barolli and Vangjel Barolli
Defendant:
David Portela , Justin Marshall , Matthew Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez v. City of Waterbury et al
as 3:2010cv01187
Plaintiff:
Anthony Melendez
Defendant:
City of Waterbury , Laffia , Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar v. Borrino et al
as 3:2008cv01844
Plaintiff:
Jerome T. Dunbar
Defendant:
David Borrino, State St Bank & Trust Co, Joseph Nardini and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dunbar v. Borrino et al
as 3:2008mc00406
Plaintiff:
Jerome T. Dunbar
Defendant:
David Borrino, State St Bank & Trust Co, Joseph Nardini and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
