Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BRANCH v. BRODER LAW GROUP, P.C. et al
as 1:2022cv06605
Plaintiff:
MARC ALAN BRANCH
Defendant:
BRODER LAW GROUP, P.C., SETH BRODER, ESQ., MICHAEL D. BRANCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv21852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BOCK, SR. v. BOROUGH OF MOUNTAINSIDE ("BOM") et al
as 2:2019cv19922
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF MOUNTAINSIDE ("BOM"), JOSEPH GIANNUZZI, ANDREW YASINSKI and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. BOCK, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv08550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
FANTUZZI v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST MILFORD et al
as 2:2015cv06206
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. FANTUZZI
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WEST MILFORD , TIMOTHY STORBECK , ROBERT R. CONGLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE et al v. TOWNSHIP OF WAYNE et al
as 2:2015cv06070
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. COLE, JR. and MARIE V. COLE
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WAYNE , TOWNSHIP OF WAYNE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN W. PARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES v. BOROUGH OF LINDENWOLD et al
as 1:2014cv05243
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. TORRES
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF LINDENWOLD, THOMAS J. BRENNAN, EDWARD SLIMM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARNEY v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2008cv04115
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. BARNEY
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS and THE COUNTY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ONLY v. OJEDA et al
as 1:2007cv05789
Plaintiff:
WARREN ONLY
Defendant:
WILFRADO OJEDA, JR, WILFREDO OJEDA, SR., ELBA OJEDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TOLAN v. FEDORCHAK et al
as 2:2007cv03870
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. TOLAN
Defendant:
MARK FEDORCHAK, JOHN ACCARDI, KEVIN DOYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
