Cases 1 - 10 of 27
DAVISTON v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2023cv02191
Plaintiff:
ALVIN D DAVISTON, JR
Defendant:
KAREN DUFFY, MICHAEL P DIGNAZIO, MARK TRACHTENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARSHALL et al v. CLARKE et al
as 2:2021cv04336
Lead Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS M. MARSHALL
Plaintiff:
SIMON CAMPBELL, ROBERT ABRAMS, TIMOTHY DALY and others
Defendant:
SOLICITOR MICHAEL P. CLARKE, PENNSBURY SCHOOL DISTRICT, CHERRISSA GIBSON and others
Petitioner:
Free to Learn Coalition and HAROLD P. KUPERMIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv06196
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ROSADO v. BARRACKS et al
as 2:2019cv05068
Defendant:
PSP. TROOPER MICHAEL P. D-U-G-A-N, LESLIE S. RICHARDS, PENNSYLVANIA. STATE. (DMV) and others
Plaintiff:
GERONIMO F. ROSADO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Mt. Airy Casino and Resort et al
as 3:2019cv01351
Defendant:
Robert O'Hara, Cpl. Thomas C. Keegan, Amanda Lou Pedhegon and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Jackson Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Primeramo et al
as 4:2017cv00990
Plaintiff:
Markist Moore
Defendant:
Bryan Primeramo, Jarrod J. Scandle and Michael P. Toomey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISABELLA v. CHAMPAGNE et al
as 2:2017cv02028
Plaintiff:
TERESA ISABELLA
Defendant:
DAVID CHAMPAGNE, PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COALITION, CHARLES J. WALSH, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Helterbran v. Targonski et al
as 4:2014cv02338
Plaintiff:
Alexander Helterbran, Jr.
Defendant:
Ann Targonski, Anthony J. Rosini, Michael P. Toomey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barto et al v. Combs
as 3:2014cv01989
Plaintiff:
Bridget Barto , William Morgan and Shawn Barto
Defendant:
Michael P. Combs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
