Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Degollado et al v. City of Port Lavaca, Texas et al
as 6:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Degollado, Daniel Herrera, Faded Smoke Shop LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Port Lavaca, Calhoun County, Texas, Collin Rangnow, Kyle Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Connall v. Basel et al
as 1:2022cv01316
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Connall
Defendant:
Yvonne Basel, FNU Lewis, FNU Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
McCarty v. Neal et al
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Karen McCarty
Defendant:
Glen Neal, Alana McClure and Jim Ned Consolidated Independent School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zvi v. Blanco Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2022cv00981
Plaintiff:
Yehudah Zvi
Defendant:
Blanco Sheriff Office, Don Jackson, Neal Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Wiemken et al v. Gurrola et al
as 4:2021cv03355
Plaintiff:
Kevin-Neal Wiemken and Greg Earl Wiemken
Defendant:
Becky Gurrola, Ellen Shelburne, Robbin Knebel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
