Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Cuara R. v. Little America Hotels et al
as 2:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Little America Hotels, Hilton Corporate Office, Marriott Corporate Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuara R. v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al
as 2:2023cv00547
Defendant:
International Cannabis Bar, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Ports America Corporate and others
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Progressive Leasing et al
as 2:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Progressive Leasing, NPRTO New York and American Arbitration Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peck v. New Hampshire, State of et al
as 2:2020cv00861
Defendant:
Kamala Harris, Joe Biden and New Hampshire, State of
Plaintiff:
Gregory Louis Peck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs et al v. Gill et al
as 2:2018cv00905
Defendant:
Kathleen Keesling, Doug Funk, Deseret News Publishing and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Gibbs and Loran Dax Sant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haws v. Maricopa County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2018cv00840
Defendant:
Tempe Prosecution, Victor Swenson, Urgent Psychiatric Care of Phoenix and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Haws
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
