Cases 1 - 6 of 6
No Casino in Plymouth, et al v. National Indian Gaming Commission, et al
as 22-15756
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NO CASINO IN PLYMOUTH, DUEWARD W. CRANFORD II, ELIDA A. MALICK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISSION, JONODEV CHAUDHURI, Former NIGC Chairman, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
IONE BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS
Roberson v. Muskogee Creek Tribal Council The et al
as 5:2020cv00113
Defendant:
Muskogee Creek Tribal Council The, Oklahoma State of, National Indian Gaming Commission, The and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip James Roberson, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dutschke v. Zinke et al
as 2:2018at00770
Defendant:
Ryan Zinke, David Bernhardt, Donald E. Laverdure and others
Plaintiff:
Amy Dutschke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
Cranford et al v. Chaudhuri et al
as 2:2018at00771
Plaintiff:
Dueward W. Cranford, II, Elida A. Malick, Jon Colburn and others
Defendant:
Jonodev O. Chaudhuri, Ryan Zinke, David Bernhardt and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
No Casino In Plymouth et al v. National Indian Gaming Commission et al
as 2:2018cv01398
Plaintiff:
No Casino In Plymouth , Dueward W. Cranford, II , Elida A. Malick and others
Defendant:
National Indian Gaming Commission, Jonodev Chaudhuri, Department of Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Narrangansett Tribe v. Natl Indian Cmsn, et al
as 97-5290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Narrangansett Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellee:
National Indian Gaming Commission and Tadd Johnson, in his official capacity as Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Ada E. Deer, in her official capacity as Acting Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Lincoln C. Almond, Honorable, in his capacity as Governor of the State of Rhode Island
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Patrick J. Kennedy, United States Congressman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
