Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Lighten v. Jim Taylor Chevrolet L L C
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Pamela Lighten
Defendant:
Jim Taylor Chevrolet and Jim Taylor Chevrolet L L C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Morgan v. Morgan-Parker et al
as 2:2022cv05393
Plaintiff:
Charles Ross Morgan and Charles-Ross Morgan
Defendant:
Ashley Nacole Mayeaux Morgan-Parker, Brian Gerard Mayeaux, Ronnie Shawn Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Quinlan v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2022cv00889
Plaintiff:
Pamela Quinlan
Defendant:
Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office and Robert F Stoltz, Jr.
Not Classified By Court:
Robert Stoltz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mays v. Bossier City Court et al
as 5:2021cv03843
Plaintiff:
John L Mays, Jr
Defendant:
Bossier City Court, Thomas A Wilson, Jr, Ford Stinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholson v. Smith et al
as 2:2019cv11804
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nicholson
Defendant:
John Donaldson, Sheriff Randy Seal, Elliot Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10855
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv11626
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Benton v. Hershy et al
as 2:2017cv17819
Plaintiff:
Angelina Benton
Defendant:
Pamela Hershy and Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
