Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Thompson v. Pierce Automotive, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Stacy Thompson
Defendant:
Pierce Automotive, Inc. doing business as Toyota of Hattiesburg, Jake Bolton, Alton Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rowry et al v. City of Meridian et al
as 3:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Mary Rowry and The Estate of Khirey Portis, The Deceased
Defendant:
City of Meridian, Meridian Police Dept., Meridian City Counsel Person[s] and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierson v. Itawamba County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2019cv00085
Defendant:
Larry Johnson, Chris Dickinson, Other Unknown Persons and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Pierson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00074
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe Persons, Entities 1 through 10 and G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. City of Greenville et al
as 4:2013cv00028
Plaintiff:
Caleb Thomas
Defendant:
City of Greenville , Jed Jones and John Doe Persons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
