Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
PETERSON-DAILY v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK et al
as 3:2023cv21148
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN PETERSON-DAILY
Defendant:
CITY OF ASBURY PARK, RONALD J. TROPPOLI, JOANNE PILLIOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REARDON v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv03629
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. REARDON
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER SMITH, POLICE OFFICER DOUGHERTY, SGT. RENZETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PETERSEN et al v. MOORE, ED.D. et al
as 3:2023cv02189
Plaintiff:
REBECCA PETERSEN and JOHN PETERSON
Defendant:
JEFFREY MOORE, ED.D. and HUNTERDON CENTRAL REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PETERSON v. HAWTHORNE BOROUGH et al
as 2:2023cv01314
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peterson
Defendant:
HAWTHORNE BOROUGH, PO HAWTHORNE, nicholas robert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv19948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TESTA v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 3:2021cv18569
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. TESTA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, SECRET SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2021cv01165
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATIONS, OFFICER JEISON MARTINEZ, OFFICER MOHAMED J SAHEED and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv18461
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv17617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
