Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwab et al v. Kobach et al
as 2:2018cv02488
Defendant:
KVCA, Phyllis Gilmore, Riley County Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond R. Schwab and Amelia D. Schwab
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kansas, State of v. Price
as 5:2013cv04080
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of
Defendant:
David Martin Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Price v. Wichita, City of, Police Department et al
as 6:2012cv01432
Plaintiff:
Lennon Price
Defendant:
Wichita, City of, Police Department and Mark McKee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rockwell v. Marysville, City of et al
as 2:2011cv02417
Plaintiff:
Richard Rockwell
Defendant:
Marysville, City of, Todd Ackerman, Jerry Birdsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
King v. Huffman et al
as 5:2011cv04001
Plaintiff:
Janice Lynn King
Defendant:
Donna Huffman, Bret D. Landrith, Samuel La Pari and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Huffman et al
as 5:2010cv04152
Plaintiff:
Janice Lynn King
Defendant:
Donna Huffman, Bret D. Landrith, Samuel La Pari and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruner-McMahon et al v. Sedgwick, County of et al
as 6:2010cv01064
Plaintiff:
Tera M. Bruner-McMahon and Jesse A. Bruner
Defendant:
Sedgwick, County of, Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department, Sedgwick County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
