Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Kenlock v. Orange County, New York et al
as 7:2020cv03693
Defendant:
Sgt. K. Kiszka, Officer Bloise, Anthony M. Mele and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Orville Kenlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07560
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06769
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Banks v. Conti et al
as 1:2014cv09345
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Joy Flowers Conti, Attorney General of the United States, Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stone et al v. Hertz et al
as 1:2014cv03478
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stone and Helen Stone
Defendant:
Jaqueline Hertz, Blaire Lapides, Roy Lustig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McCrudden v. US Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al
as 1:2013cv06930
Plaintiff:
Vincent Patrick McCrudden
Defendant:
US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Gary Gensler, Timothy J. Mulreaney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. Norman et al
as 1:2012cv08132
Plaintiff:
Dawn Norman Jackson
Defendant:
Boeca Norman, Rhoda Patnettll, Gays Corbelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
