Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Combs v. County of Lane et al
as 6:2024cv01016
Defendant:
County of Lane and Elizabeth Rambo
Plaintiff:
Talitha Lacey Combs and Talitha Lacey Randall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Stout v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01225
Plaintiff:
Shannon Stout
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Tagaloa Manu, Tyler Stepper and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Bliss et al v. Adewusi et al
as 3:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Nigel Bliss, Dayna Bliss, J. B. and others
Defendant:
Adebimpe Adewusi, Keyvan Abtin, Patrick Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Fonseca v. City of Medford et al
as 1:2022cv01416
Plaintiff:
April Fonseca and April Ehrlich
Defendant:
City of Medford, Jackson County, James Barringer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Feeley v. Earl et al
as 3:2017cv00649
Defendant:
Allan R. Earl, William Kephart and A. Randall Thoman
Plaintiff:
Aaron Scott Feeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01621
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Colson v. Portland Adventist Medical Center
as 3:2015cv01601
Plaintiff:
Brent Randall Colson
Defendant:
Portland Adventist Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
