Cases 1 - 10 of 40
JOHNSON v. 1011778 B.C. UNLIMITED LIABILTY COMPANY et al
as 3:2024cv06914
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
1011778 B.C. UNLIMITED LIABILTY COMPANY, 1019334 B.C. UNLIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, BURGER KING CANADA HOLDING INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-cv-04113
as 3:2024cv04113
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, JANE DOE-2 and others
Defendant:
RED VIOLET, INC., RICHARD ROES 1-10 and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
GARDNER v. BOROUGH OF RED BANK et al
as 3:2023cv02633
Plaintiff:
KRISTEN GARDNER
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF RED BANK, PRESTON MELLACI and KIRSTIN ALTIMARI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06824
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv09564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
