Cases 1 - 10 of 38
GRAHAM v. CRISP REGIONAL HOSPITAL
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
HILDA GRAHAM
Defendant:
CRISP REGIONAL HOSPITAL, PAVEL BOMAR, MARISSA BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BROWN v. HOOKS
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN and MASON B BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT HOOKS, KERTAVIOUS COPPINS, AARON GUILLAUME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cheese v. Cordele Judicial Circuit et al
as 1:2022cv04028
Plaintiff:
Rodney T. Cheese
Defendant:
Cordele Judicial Circuit, Darton State College, West Central Regional Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Hennepin County Department of Human Resource and Public Health et al
as 1:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Nadia Jackson
Defendant:
Hennepin County Department of Human Resource and Public Health, Georgia Department of Human Resources & Public Health and Southern Regional Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Diarra v. Cromartle et al
as 1:2020cv02377
Defendant:
Devon Simpson, John Doe, DBHDD and others
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Davis v. Southern Regional Hospital
as 1:2017cv01874
Plaintiff:
John Troy Davis
Defendant:
Southern Regional Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
