Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Robert Lee Manning, Jr. v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2022cv03829
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, The State of California, The City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Manning, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv09470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Manning v. The Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01790
Defendant:
The Boeing Company, The Hertz Corporation, Does 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Manning, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Manning, Jr. v. Cozena Shelton, et al
as 14-55069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE MANNING, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
COZENA SHELTON, DAVID T. QUEZADA, CHARLES E. HAUPTMAN and others
Robert Manning, Jr. v. L. A. County District Attorney, et al
as 13-56918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE MANNING, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, White Collar Crime Division, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Robert Lee Manning, Jr v. Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office White Collar Crime Division et al
as 2:2013cv06905
Defendant:
Does, Judge Rex Heeseman, Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office White Collar Crime Division and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Manning, Jr.
Robert Lee Manning v. United States Department of Education et al
as 2:2012cv03060
Defendant:
Embrey Riddle Aeronautical University and United States Department of Education
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Manning, Jr.
Robert Lee Manning v. Cozena Shelton et al
as 2:2012cv03058
Defendant:
Charles E Hauptman, Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, David T Quezada and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Manning, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
