Cases 1 - 10 of 35
TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-cv-4073
as 2:2024cv04073
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, JANE DOE-2 and others
Defendant:
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE EXCHANGE, INC., RICHARD ROES 1-10 and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
DAPRATO et al v. VILLAGE OF RIDGEFIELD PARK et al
as 2:2022cv05595
Plaintiff:
Paul DaPrato and Thor Real Estate, LLC
Defendant:
VILLAGE OF RIDGEFIELD PARK and MICHAEL LANDOLFI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
OAKLYN VILLAS URBAN RENEWAL LLC et al v. BOROUGH OF OAKLYN et al
as 1:2022cv03177
Plaintiff:
OAKLYN VILLAS URBAN RENEWAL LLC and DEPETRO REAL ESTATE ORGANIZATION LLC
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF OAKLYN, GREGORY BRANDLEY, CHARLES LEHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
SCHEID v. FEIGIN et al
as 1:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
JOSEPHINE SCHEID
Defendant:
GERALD A. FEIGIN, EMMANUEL RODRIGUEZ, HALEY MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv19669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
