Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Nkrumah et al v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, New Haven Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nkrumah et al v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, Justin Elicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02152
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Diaz et al v. City of Hartford Police Department et al
as 3:2018cv01113
Defendant:
Sean Spell, Luis Ruiz, Stephen Barone and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Leon Perez and Emilio Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00235
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evarts v. Rodriguez
as 3:2014cv01973
Plaintiff:
Ellsworth Evarts, IV
Defendant:
Ricardo R. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beverly Hills Suites LLC et al v. Windsor Locks et al
as 3:2012cv00871
Plaintiff:
Beverly Hills Suites LLC , Windsor Locks Family Trust and Sharok Jacobi
Defendant:
Town of Windsor Locks, Windsor Locks Police Department, John Suckocki, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brown v. Clayton et al
as 3:2011cv00714
Plaintiff:
George Brown
Defendant:
Ivan J. Clayton, Carl Bergquist, Edward Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
