Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Hutchison v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Mr. Robert C. Hutchison
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc., Honeywell Electronics, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Sweatt
as 2:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Ms. Johnnie Marene Thomas
Defendant:
Judge Robert C. Sweatt, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hutchison v. Live Well Counseling et al
as 1:2021cv02973
Plaintiff:
Mr. Robert C. Hutchison
Defendant:
Live Well Counseling, Honeywell LLC, Alex Azar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchison et al v. Live Well Counseling et al
as 1:2021cv02311
Defendant:
Keli A. Detty, Virtual Technologies Ltd., Wade T. Moses and others
Plaintiff:
D.A.B., Anayenci Hutchison, A.P.H. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05114
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04622
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jaudon v. Sasser et al
as 2:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Shanesia S. Jaudon
Defendant:
Robert C. Sasser, Mike Thomas, Timothy Hollingsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Damali v. City of East Point, Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv00741
Plaintiff:
Tanner Damali
Defendant:
City of East Point, Georgia and Robert C. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Calhoun et al v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2017cv00530
Defendant:
City of Atlanta , Richard Pennington , Marlon O. Noble and others
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Calhoun , Benjamin Cheaves , John Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
