Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Black v. Royal Oak, City of et al
as 2:2023cv12371
Plaintiff:
Scott Aaron Black [E-filer]
Defendant:
Royal Oak, City of, Nathan Heppner, Joshua Little and others
Gordon v. Bierenga et al
as 5:2018cv13834
Defendant:
Keith Bierenga and Royal Oak, City of
Plaintiff:
PR Nita Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Wynes v. Royal Oak, City of et al
as 2:2016cv12656
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wynes
Defendant:
Royal Oak, City of and Michael Paramo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffman v. Royal Oak, City of et al
as 2:2014cv12237
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Hoffman
Defendant:
Royal Oak, City of and Donald Scher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CBS Outdoor, Inc. v. Royal Oak, City of
as 2:2011cv13887
Plaintiff:
CBS Outdoor, Inc.
Defendant:
Royal Oak, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jermano v. Taylor et al
as 2:2011cv10739
Plaintiff:
M Amelia (Neal) Jermano
Defendant:
Troy Taylor, Rachel Meyers, Eric Zarfl and others
Citizens Bank v. Canner et al
as 2:2011cv10256
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
James Canner , James B. Canner Revocable Trust and AFKF, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Citizens Bank
Defendant:
James Canner , James B. Canner Revocable Trust and AFKF, L.L.C.
Intervenor_defendant:
HJR Holding, LLC
Counter_claimant:
HJR Holding, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Citizens Bank
Thirdparty_defendant:
Royal Oak, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Niemkiewicz et al v. Royal Oak, City of
as 2:2009cv12215
Plaintiff:
Thomas Niemkiewicz and Lisa Niemkiewicz
Defendant:
Royal Oak, City of and Royal Oak, City of
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv13995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carpman Fitness, LLC v. City of Royal Oak
as 2:2008cv13207
Plaintiff:
Carpman Fitness, LLC
Defendant:
Royal Oak, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
